Liberty Briefs: Inside ICE and CBP’s Growing Threat to Civil Liberties

Liberty Briefs is a new series of brief, shareable essays on topics core to the pro-democracy mission of Liberty’s Lens. These pieces are always free to read, and readers are encouraged to share them widely—whether here on Substack or copied into other formats where personal text travels further than links. The goal is simple: make sure the information travels.

What to know about ICE’s Warrantless Home Entry Policy

According to a whistleblower, ICE leadership quietly reversed a long‑standing policy that barred agents from entering homes without a judicial warrant because doing so violated the Constitution. The new claim is that if ICE is seeking someone with a final deportation order, agents may force entry into a home using an “administrative warrant” signed by ICE itself.

ICE is relying on a theory that administrative immigration process can substitute for a judge’s warrant when entering a home — a theory that only exists because the targets are non‑citizens subject to civil removal orders. No such argument would ever be entertained if the person were a citizen. That’s not a new question; the Supreme Court has long held that law enforcement cannot simply issue its own warrants.

And here’s where it gets dystopian. If that logic holds, then whose rights actually matter? If ICE enters my home looking for someone else, do I suddenly lose my Fourth Amendment protections because a deportation order exists somewhere in the building?

How ICE Has Turned Racial Profiling Into Policy

The erosion of civil liberties doesn’t end with warrantless home entries. In a recent court case in Oregon, an ICE agent testified under oath to something DHS officials have publicly denied for years: the existence of arrest quotas.

DHS leadership, including former Secretary Noem, has insisted there are no quotas and no racial profiling. But in this case, ICE agents testified plainly that quotas exist and that officers are required to meet numerical arrest targets.

The problem with arrest quotas—whether in immigration enforcement or any other form of policing—is structural. Once you impose a numerical mandate, enforcement stops being about identifying specific wrongdoing and starts being about producing numbers. You stop building cases. You stop tracking individuals. You go out into the streets.

So how do agents meet those quotas? They rely on profiling. Construction workers are tailed on their way to job sites. Faces are scanned with facial‑recognition software. If someone isn’t already in a database, that absence itself becomes grounds for suspicion—treated as evidence of illegal entry.

The result is that tens of thousands of Americans are stopped, detained, and questioned by ICE agents based on appearance rather than individualized suspicion. The clearest illustration of this came from Fox News—of all places—which followed an ICE team during a construction‑site operation in Florida and framed it as a successful enforcement action.

By the end of the day, ICE had arrested roughly 30 people. But they had stopped, detained, interrogated, or otherwise interfered with more than 300. That’s a roughly ten‑percent hit rate. From ICE’s perspective—and Fox’s framing—it was a success. The quota was met. And the civil liberties of ten times as many people were treated as collateral damage in the process.

This is why congressional oversight matters. These practices aren’t just about immigration enforcement; they’re about stripping people of the right to live free from government interference when there’s no reason to believe they’ve done anything wrong.

The Trump regime’s authoritarian project depends on misinformation and disinformation. It thrives in darkness and resists scrutiny. That’s why exposure matters — and why independent media does too.

A free society depends on a free press. Not one shaped by access, intimidation, or political loyalty, but one willing to report what those in power would rather keep hidden.

Liberty’s Lens exists for that purpose. We’re independent, reader‑supported, and committed to reporting without fear or favor.

If that work matters to you, consider supporting it by subscribing — free or paid. Paid subscriptions directly fund our reporting, and right now you can subscribe at 20% off with this coupon, roughly the cost of a monthly coffee.

If a subscription isn’t workable at the moment, one‑time contributions are a meaningful alternative. And whether or not financial support is possible, sharing this work matters — it’s how reporting like this reaches people it would otherwise be kept from.

Your support keeps independent journalism alive.

Find us on X, Blue Sky, and Facebook. Wherever you are, that’s where we want to be.

Key reading:

ICE’s Secret Policy to Forcibly Enter Homes Without a Judicial Warrant Threatens All Americans | American Immigration Council

DHS Warrantless Home Entry Memo’s Fourth Amendment Problem | Brennan Center for Justice

Immigrants and U.S. Citizens Sue DHS over Unconstitutional “Home Entry” Policy | ACLU of DC

— Liberty’s Lens

This article is provided for public interest reporting and analysis. All external links open in a new tab and point to their original publishers.

© 2026 Liberty’s Lens. All rights reserved.